Probably the most cringe thing I’ve seen on this app in a long time.
Zora forces creators to sell tokens on their holders to get the realize value (both creator token and Zora).
@coinage_media partnered with @zora and shocker came out with some bullshit video about how it solves middle-man problems with social.
1) false - the $ZORA token and your creator coin is now your middle man. You must hope people buy and $ZORA maintains value as a MOE within its platform. Queue death spiral potential.
2) The idiot talking suggests that the ‘flywheel’ Saylor had made is of sound economic principles and that ‘attention’ is a hard asset like $BTC.
I personally think Saylors Strat inevitably fails bc it’s a ponzi. Regardless I also think attention is the least hard asset in existence bc it is fleeting. You’re popular 1 day, to be ignored the next. Sure they’re are exceptions, but when disaggregated attention is the MOST volatile asset in existence with zero backing. Don’t bullshit your IP etc as value, if no one listens, doesn’t matter.
This whole thing is a masterclass is gaslighting and psyops. Everyone who listens to this critically needs a o ask themselves - does this make sense?
Do we want to monetize everything? Is what we’re selling a dream that our content will be forever valuable bc muh LP has tokens? All the while the creator has to sell on you to realize gains?
Not a fucking chance. This is peak lunacy and I hope anyone pitching you things like this, ahem coinage, Zora, base, Jesse pollak, will forever be known as the gaslighting cabal bc that’s what they are.
Rant end.
9,645
1
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。